State Assembly elections are due in four states this year, in double that number of states besides the Lok Sabha elections next year, in three states during 2020 and in six states the following year. There has been no year in the recent past when elections were not held in one state or the other.
That’s one of the major arguments taken by the votaries of those who are seeking simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha as well as state Assemblies. They claim that the top political leaders, and consequently the governments they run, remain constantly in election mode and this ‘diverts’ their attention from developmental works. They also claim that the frequent enforcement of model code of conduct also derails progress and governments refrain from taking harsh decisions with election prospects in mind.
The most prominent among them to make a case for simultaneous elections are none else than President Ram Nath Kovind and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. BJP has always expressed itself in favour of holding simultaneous elections and had even said in its 2014 manifesto that it would "evolve method of holding Assembly and Lok Sabha elections simultaneously”.
Although the party leaders maintained a studied silence on this issue over the last four years, the re-emergence of the issue in the wake of reports that the Modi government may go in for early elections to Lok Sabha to cut down on anti incumbency, has led to a debate on the feasibility of the idea.
India is a "Union of States” and its strength lies in its diversity. Each state has its unique identity and priorities. These have their own dynamics besides regional identities and aspirations. It can’t be a one-hat-fits-all situation and would be clearly an anti-democratic measure.
Other political parties have remained divided over the issue. Congress had opposed the proposal on the grounds that it was ‘impractical’, the left parties too doubt its feasibility while the Trinamool Congress had called it "undemocratic and unconstitutional”. Some of the regional parties like the AIADMK and AGP had backed the BJP stand.
While the country had witnessed simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha and Assemblies till 1967, a variety of factors such as early dissolution of Lok Sabha, dismissal of state governments or fall of some governments, had led to disruption of the schedule. Another major factor was that it was virtually a one-party rule in the country with the Congress dominating the scene. Much water has flown down the Ganges since then and other parties, including the BJP and a host of regional parties, have emerged stronger.
Also apart from the gigantic practical task of holding simultaneous elections, which would need setting up of over 7,00,000 polling booths, deployment of staff to man these booths, security arrangements and the procurement of double the number of existing voting machines, several factors would make it an unworkable task.
But even more important than these factors would be the impact it would have on the federal structure of our nation. India is a "Union of States” and its strength lies in its diversity. Each state has its unique identity and priorities. These have their own dynamics besides regional identities and aspirations. It can’t be a one-hat-fits-all situation and would be clearly an anti-democratic measure.
Let the governments and leaders remain on their toes and face electorate from time to time. Their performance must be put to test at the altar of democracy.
Such a provision would place huge powers in the hands of the ruling party or coalition at the Centre which enjoys power under Article 356 to dismiss state governments. It could take various pleas to dismiss governments and make them face elections. Then there is the question of keeping states under prolonged Central rule to await simultaneous elections. What would happen if state governments fall due to splits and political dissensions or if the government at the Centre falls. To reduce frequency of elections, there could be minor tweaking to ensure that wherever elections are due, these are held just once in a year. Even currently the Election Commission clubs together elections due in six months.
However, the federal structure conceived by the members of the constituent Assembly and enshrined in the constitution would come under tremendous strain if the government goes ahead with the idea of holding all elections simultaneously or even in mid-term slabs of two and a half years each. Fortunately such a change would require a constitutional amendment and the current government is not in a position to push it through on its own.
While it is true that top political leaders remain constantly in election mode and have elections at the back of their mind, the very idea of simultaneous elections militates against the federal structure.
The pros of the current system far outweigh the cons. Let the governments and leaders remain on their toes and face electorate from time to time. Their performance must be put to test at the altar of democracy. We must trust the voters whose mandate must be earned and respected by all political parties. The ill conceived idea of simultaneous elections after five years must be dumped for good.
*(The author, a freelance journalist, is a former Resident Editor of Indian Express, Chandigarh, and reported on the political developments in Jammu and Kashmir, North-Eastern India, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana and Punjab in his long, illustrious career. This article was also published by lokmarg.com and is being reproduced here with the due permission of the author. - Ed)
Disclaimer : PunjabToday.in and other platforms of the Punjab Today group strive to include views and opinions from across the entire spectrum, but by no means do we agree with everything we publish. Our efforts and editorial choices consistently underscore our authors' right to the freedom of speech. However, it should be clear to all readers that individual authors are responsible for the information, ideas or opinions in their articles, and very often, these do not reflect the views of PunjabToday.in or other platforms of the group. Punjab Today does not assume any responsibility or liability for the views of authors whose work appears here.
Most shared Punjab Today articles:
WOOING THE PANTH: Amarinder a little less Congressy, Akali Dal a little more saffron
DEATH EMBRACING LOGIC: Drugs in Punjab
PANJAB'S EMERGENCY: FORMAL AND INFORMAL
THE KASHMIR GOVERNOR, THE TRIBUNE TRUST & ETHICS - How Journalism Fails Readers?
"Congress Sikhan Di Dushman Jamaat Hai?” —Akalis need to dump broken record, shift gears
"Captain Amarinder Singh ji” and "Rahul”: Reading Sign Language In A Relationship
SARKAR IN MANALI: From Shahkot to Mohali Court, Sara Alam Bigrra Jaye
If it could happen to Arun Shourie, imagine what could they do to you?
SIKHS & FEMINISTS – We hailed Harjit Sajjan; they didn’t hail Gina Haspel
AFTER BEING RAPED, I WAS WOUNDED; MY HONOUR WAS NOT
The Comrade In Punjab - Lost, Irrelevant, Asleep, Even Bored!
WE MISSED A REVOLUTION, BUT CAN IT STILL BE A GAME CHANGER?
A POLITICIAN SPEAKS – YOU SHOULD HEAR
ENCOUNTER, JULOOS & SELFIES
SOWING ANGER - NO QUICK FIX - Democracy is an Empty Ritual in Punjab
OUT-OF-BOX SOLUTION TO STOP FARMERS' SUICIDES
WATERS ROYALTY - The Loot that Rajasthan Committed
'THORRI BAHUTI EHNA NU SHARAM AUNI CHAHEEDI HAI'
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON SUICIDE-HIT BATS FOR AARHTIYAS
RANGROOT OFFERS A PEEK INTO PUNJAB'S TRAGEDY
WHAT MAKE NEWS IN INDIA, AND WHAT DOES NOT?
HITLER, MODI & GANDHI: ON THE SAME PAGE?
PUNJAB IS STILL VERY FAR FROM INDIA
APOLOGY – AKALIS BIG LOSER, CONG TOO
AMARINDER GOVT's LOVE FOR FARMERS, AND MY DAD's FOR HIS SCOOTER
SUPER EFFICIENCY ONBOARD CM’S CHOPPER
OF SUNNY KID & HORSE SENSE: The Punjab-Punjab Ties: The Coordinated Silence of Amarinder Singh & Badals
PM MODI VINDICATES PUNJAB TODAY REPORTAGE
NEW DELHI V/S OTTAWA — WILL QUEBEC DEFEAT INDIA?
A SAFFRON JOURNEY VIA CANADA - Trudeau came to Punjab, pushed Amarinder closer to BJP, then called him a liar
JASPAL ATWAL CONTROVERSY: Mr. Ujjal, will you throw some light on this too?
TRUDEAU VISIT AND RIGHT-WING MEDIA MACHINE
J&K – RAM MADHAV LEAVES SPACE FOR MEHBOOBA’S POLITICS
SHEKHAR GUPTA'S HALF-BAKED TRUTHS
OF NIRMAL SINGH'S EYES - Karze Ne Layee Ikk Hor Kisan Di Jaan...
PNB Scam: Who is Nirav Choksi and what he is doing In the name of God?
Congress upset due to Priyanka’s cleavage on calendar
RENUKA'S LAUGHTER: Thank you for your guffaws. We needed this non-violent weapon.
MR CLEAN to PAKKE DHEETH: How Punjab’s Congress hurt Brand Rahul Gandhi?
MANJIT SINGH CALCUTTA– THE DISSENTER
PUNJAB FARMERS AND IPL CRICKETERS - Finally, they can stand like equals
Mr. CHIEF MINISTER, PLEASE CALL OFF JANUARY 7 FUNCTION. My teacher is not alive, but you please call it off!
SUKHBIR IS RIGHT – On 97th anniversary – Panth Khatre Vich Hai. Where does this threat come from?
THE FINAL HONESTY CERTIFICATE: ISSUED BY THE TRIBUNE
NO TIME TO READ THIS STORY? – That’s OK - Please do not feel guilty
BAD, BAD WOMAN! – Punjab’s top playwright slams woman complainant against Langah
MR PRESIDENT, PLEASE TAKE BACK HIS GALLANTRY MEDAL – On Amod Kanth’s badge of shame
RELAX! ALL 30 WERE DERA PREMIS – Panchkula says something stinking about its conscience
PUNJAB: AN IDEA IN SEARCH OF WORDS: Punjab, more than a poster boy of progress or a renegade from modernity
Punjab Today believes in serious, engaging, narrative journalism at a time when mainstream media houses seem to have given up on long-form writing and news television has blurred or altogether erased the lines between news and slapstick entertainment. We at Punjab Today believe that readers such as yourself appreciate cerebral journalism, and would like you to hold us against the best international industry standards. Brickbats are welcome even more than bouquets, though an occasional pat on the back is always encouraging. Good journalism can be a lifeline in these uncertain times worldwide. You can support us in myriad ways. To begin with, by spreading word about us and forwarding this reportage. Stay engaged.
— Team PT