Union Minister of State for Finance, Anurag Thakur, must be credited for taking Indian politics to a higher virulent and toxic level than ever before.
At an election rally for the forthcoming Delhi Assembly elections on 8th February he shouted from a podium "Desh ke gaddaaron ko", and sure enough, the bloodthirsty mob, like the one calling for hanging of Cinna the poet merely because he bore the same name as one of the murderers of Caesar (in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar) shouted in response "Goli maaron saalon ko".
Everyone knows that in India elections are not contested on real issues like poverty, unemployment, malnourishment, lack of healthcare and good education, etc but on emotional issues like building Ram Mandir on so called Ram Janmabhoomi (which increased the BJP’s seats in the Lok Sabha from 2 in 1984 to 183 in 1999), cow protection, bashing the devil called Pakistan (the Balakot attack was of great help to the BJP, which was projected as a party of ‘chowkidars
’ in the 2019 elections which gave it 303 seats) etc.
But the sheer brazenness of Anurag Thakur’s slogan really takes the cake. And the beauty of it is that it cannot be called an election corrupt practice under section 123 (3A) of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951, since it is delightfully vague.
Section 123(3A) regards as a corrupt practice "The promotion, or attempt to promote, feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes of citizens of India on grounds of religion, race, caste, community or language by a candidate or his agent or any other person with the consent of a candidate or his election agent for the furtherance of the prospects of the election of that candidate or for prejudicially affecting the election of any candidate".
Now the candidate was present in the meeting in which Anurag Thakur said this, so his statement was certainly with the consent of the candidate, But did it promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different communities or castes ? There is nothing in the statement which expressly does so, and it is well settled that an election malpractice must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, like a criminal offence.
Who are the ‘desh ke gaddaar‘ who deserve to be shot? The expression can have any number of meanings. It can mean minorities like Muslims and Christians, who are perceived as terrorists and anti national. It can mean all those who are anti BJP. It can mean liberals. It can mean JNU, AMU and Jamia students (the tukde tukde gang). It can mean many other things.
In my opinion if the BJP wins the forthcoming Delhi Assembly elections (and I think it will) the primary credit must go to Anurag Thakur, much more than to Amit Shah. The latter only spoke of pressing the button of an EVM machine to disperse the anti CAA crowd in Shaheen Bagh. The former, on the other hand, has raised hatred against the undefined ‘desh drohis‘ to a feverish venomous pitch, and now the bloodthirsty mob will seek out the Cinnas to hang them for their bad verses.
By advocating violence, Anurag Thakur has opened a new dimension in Indian politics, which will resemble the last years of the Weimar Republic in Germany when strong arm thugs like the S.A. and S.S. roamed the streets of Berlin, Munich etc winning arguments not by words but by breaking skulls.
I have several times said that though the Preamble to our Constitution declares India as a secular Republic, the ground reality is very different. In India most Hindus (80-90%) are communal, and so are most Muslims. Till 2014 this communalism was usually latent and erupted only occasionally, but thereafter it has become open, virulent and continuous. Anurag Thakur’s statement will open up a Nazi era in Indian politics.
The great German leader Bismarck in a speech in 1862 to the Prussian Landtag said "The great issues of the day will not be decided by votes and speeches but by blood and iron (blut und eisen)". Indian politics seems also headed in the same direction.
Justice Markandey Katju is former Judge, Supreme Court of India and former Chairman, Press Council of India.