Monthly Archives: APRIL 2017

Sikhs, Christians should speak up against Hindutva mobs before it’s too late
29.04.17 - Sunny Hundal*
Sikhs, Christians should speak up against Hindutva mobs before it’s too late

As right wing forces flex their Hindutva muscles and use them against Muslims across the country, Sikhs and Christians will be watching in worry. But the time for them to speak out is now, not when the mob comes for them. By then it will be too late.

Sikhs know this better than any other religious minority in India. The state-directed genocide in 1984 showed that Indian politicians rarely face charges for stirring up hatred against non-Hindus. But what is at stake here for Sikhs isn’t just their own safety but the protection of an important principle.

If you are born into a Sikh family, like myself, chances are you have been taught about the sacrifice of Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji. In 1675 a group of fearful Hindu pundits approached the Guru to ask for his help against the Mughal king Aurangzeb, who wanted to forcibly convert them to Islam. The Guru had a challenge for the king. If he could convert him to Islam then the Kashmiri pandits would follow. But, of course, Aurangzeb was unsuccessful and Guru Tegh Bahadur paid for his principles with his life.
The ninth Guru of the Sikhs wasn’t taking the side of Hindus against Muslims, he died to defend the right to practice religion without intimidation. But his sacrifice was more than just a lesson for Sikhs, it was also an example. Guru Tegh Bahadur wanted Sikhs to protect others from such intimidation too.

This is why the growing number of incidents of violent cow-vigilantism should matter to Sikhs, Christians and other minorities. While many Hindus pretend that Muslims are being targeted only for violating the law and ignoring their sentiments, it is clear this is a lie. In numerous cases, Muslims have been murdered merely on a vague suspicion of eating beef or transporting cows, without evidence. Hindus caught committing the same crime have been let go.

Cows should be protected through democratic means, not mob justice. This is no better than Pakistanis murdering Hindus on suspicion of ‘blasphemy’. In headlines around the world, Indian politicians are seen as caring more for the safety of cows than women.

Of course Hindus have the right to worship the cow and protect it from harm if they believe it is holy. And as a vegetarian, I also believe eating meat is wrong (as do many Sikhs). So in principle I actually agree with the gau-rakshaks.
But this is no more than a campaign of hate and intimidation against a religious group. This is Hindutva’s way of striking at Pakistan. The cow vigilantes hate Aurangzeb and all he stood for, but they have become him.

Sikhs, Christians and others should see it as a warning. The Hindutva movement needs to keep creating controversies to polarise the nation. Like a parasite it will grow by consuming its victim and then moving to the next one.

A famous European quote comes to mind. After the Second World War a German priest spoke of his regret in not opposing Hitler earlier. He wrote: "First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Socialist.” Then they came for the Trade Unionists and the same happened. Then the Jews. "Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.”

India’s religious minorities have always been suspicious of Hindutva, aware that one day they could be on the receiving end of its intolerance. That day is arriving faster than they realise.


[home] 1-2 of 2


your name*

email address*

You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*

When the Mughals turned to demonetisation
29.04.17 - Prakash Bhandari*
When the Mughals turned to demonetisation

The Indian rupee, which draws its name from the Sanskrit word rupyakam, has been at the centre of many discussions and debates following the demonetisation of high value currency notes on November 8.

But this is not the first time that India's currency of the time has faced the axe.

The Mughals, after invading a territory, would effect the demonetisation of the local currency with the aim to cripple the economy of the land, says art historian Chandramani Singh.

They would then exchange the previous ruler's coins invariably for a lower value to ensure that the local people became dependent on them and toed their line.

Akbar's army, led by his general, Raja Man Singh of Amber, was ordered to seize all the local coins after conquering a territory.

In their place, coins from Akbar's mints would be issued.

So, Akbar was instrumental in starting 'sikkabandi'.

Akbar liked the coins that were prevalent during his forerunner Sher Shah Suri's reign and issued gold, silver and copper coins on those patterns, even adopting their weight and fabric.

But, quite like today, he too faced the problem of counterfeit currency, especially from rulers in the southern parts of India who would issue fake coins resembling those from Akbar's mint.

To counter this problem, Akbar would often change the weight and form of his gold coins and the inscriptions on them.

He was also the first to issue coins of Rs 10, Rs 12 and Rs 20 as well as fractional coins.

After his death, his son Jahangir inherited the throne. Born to a Hindu mother, Jodha Bai (the princess of Amber), Jahangir issued gold and silver coins that had Hindu zodiacal signs like Mesh (Aries), Kark (Cancer), Tula (Libra), Makar (Capricorn) and so on.

Later, as Jahangir's physical and mental powers began to fail him, he left the administration of the kingdom to his favourite wife, Nur Jahan, and, in his own words, contended himself by a seer of wine and a seer of kebab.

Nur Jahan became the de facto ruler of the Moghul empire. She too issued coins from various mints. These coins bore this couplet:

Ba Hukm Shah Jahangir yaft sad zewer,
Banam Nur Jahan Badshah Begum zar
(By the order of Jahangir, gold attained a hundred times its beauty when the name of Nur Jahan, the First Lady of the court, was impressed upon it).

These coins did not find favour with Shah Jahan who became the emperor after Jahangir's death.

He did not like the Hindu zodiacal signs on them and also the fact that they carried the name of Nur Jahan, whom he hated.

"So, in 1630, in one of the cruelest forms of demonetisation, he ordered a ban on the use of these coins," says Triloki Das Khandelwal, an 86-year-old Jaipur-based coin collector.

"He ruled that anybody found in possession of these coins would be given the death penalty."

In sheer panic, people made a beeline for the emperor's revenue offices to get the coins replaced.

In Khandelwal's collection are some of these coins that he bought 50 years ago for Rs 200.

There is also a quarter anna copper coin that was issued by the Maharaja of Jodhpur in 1936 only to be demonetised 11 months later.

The story goes that a constitutional crisis arose in the British empire in 1936 when King Edward VIII proposed to marry American socialite Wallis Simpson.

Once divorced, she was now seeking a divorce from her second husband. The marriage was opposed by the British government as well as various legal, political and religious bodies.

Simpson was perceived to be politically and socially unsuitable to be queen. The Church of England asked the king to choose between her and the crown.

The king chose to abdicate the throne and marry Simpson.

In Jodhpur, the maharaja had issued the quarter anna copper coins to commemorate the coronation of King Edward VIII. The viceroy of India now ordered him to withdraw them.

The coins were still in circulation and the move to withdraw them came as a shock to the people of Jodhpur.

"In the city, a drummer went around announcing in Marwari the withdrawal of the King Edward VIII marked coins," recounts Mandal Nath Joshi, a priest who was 12 when the demonetisation was effected in Jodhpur.

The exchange was done at various revenue offices of the Jodhpur state. "People used to line up at these offices, just like they lined up outside banks and at ATMs."

In Jodhpur, people faced problems for a few days as the shopkeepers would not accept the banned coins.

"But in the rural areas, it took time to make people believe that the coins could be withdrawn and it took months to get all the coins back from the desert state. Eventually, the coins were melted in the state mint."

[home] 1-2 of 2


your name*

email address*

You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*





Copyright © 2016-2017